The Hidden Costs of a High Conflict Divorce

What a High Conflict Divorce Actually Costs

What a High Conflict Divorce Actually Costs

People sometimes assume that fighting harder produces a better settlement. In financial cases the opposite is generally true, because conflict consumes the money that was meant to be divided.

Where the money goes

Every message that has to pass through solicitors carries a cost. In a high conflict case there are hundreds of them: requests for information already provided, disputes over wording, arguments about procedure.

Then the hearings. Each one needs preparation, attendance and follow up, all charged by the hour. Application fees and counsel's fees sit on top.

Then the reports. Property valuations, business valuations, forensic analysis of accounts. Each costs hundreds or thousands and each adds delay, which adds more correspondence.

A contested financial application commonly reaches £20,000 to £30,000 for each party. That is not the extreme case. That is the ordinary one.

What delay costs on top

The longer it takes, the more the ground shifts underneath it:

  • Property prices move, so agreed figures stop being accurate
  • Mortgage offers expire
  • Debts accrue
  • Temporary arrangements that were meant to last weeks become unaffordable

Every one of those changes means revisiting something already discussed.

The costs that never appear on an invoice

Sustained stress affects work. People take time off, turn down opportunities or simply function less well. Some need counselling. Some need temporary accommodation for longer than planned.

Where there are children, the effects reach them too. What harms children in a separation is not the separation itself but sustained conflict between their parents, which a contested case extends by months.

What it does to the settlement itself

Less to divide. Every pound spent on fees is a pound not going into housing, pensions or the children.

Less control. A Judge applies the law to the facts. They cannot take account of what matters to you personally, because that is not their function.

Less flexibility. Negotiated settlements can be shaped around particular circumstances. Court orders follow established patterns.

The alternative

Mediation costs a fraction of a contested case, because both parties are paying one person rather than funding two legal teams to argue with each other.

It takes weeks rather than months. Both parties keep control of the terms - and it ends in exactly the same thing: a consent order approved by the court, binding on both of you.

The question is not whether you will end up with a court order. It is how much of your money will be left by the time you get one.

The first conversation is free and there is no obligation.

Get In Touch